Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 341 - 360 of 13,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As a consequence, the subject-matter of claim 1 of request F lacks novelty over D1.Request A[4.1] Claim 1 of request A concerns the use of a biocompatible material for manufacturing a strip for the treatment of female urinary incontinence by means of a method corresponding to a method according to claim 1 of request F. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:55 am by Glenn Reynolds
. “You can read the linked post for a full account of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s tortured explanations of why it just isn’t interested in the Occupiers, no matter how many crimes and terrorist acts they may commit.” The SPLC is a bunch of partisan hacks. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
“[T]he test for sufficiency is whether the disclosure of the application relied upon reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filing date. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
” The parties all knew about the ‘836 patent but didn’t include it — Doesn’t matter because presumption goes against patentee. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Lozano, 697 F.3d at 51 n. 8 ("It would have been a simple matter, if the state parties to the Convention wished to take account of the possibility that an abducting parent might make it difficult for the petitioning parent to discover the child's whereabouts, to run the period ‘from the date that the petitioning parent learned [or, could reasonably have learned] of the child's whereabouts. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 1:09 am
By Mary Mack | Sound Evidence The stakes couldn't be higher in the Intel/AMD safe harbor dispute, part of a multibillion dollar antitrust matter. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 7:19 am
Microsoft Corp., 214 F.3d 1342, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 9:34 pm
Because the F&S and KJOG papers had some common authors, F&S dropped the plagiarism accusation. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 12:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But First Databank’s revised definitions of “F” and “O” weren’t binary in that way. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The feasibility of steps D, F and G of claim 1 in view of A 83 is particularly problematic. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Findlay, 100 F.3d 263, 267-69 (2d Cir.1996) ("[T]he text of FAA § 4 should not be interpreted to mean that a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction over an action to compel or stay arbitration merely because the underlying claim raises a federal question. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:32 pm
Findlay, 100 F.3d 263, 267-69 (2d Cir.1996) ("[T]he text of FAA § 4 should not be interpreted to mean that a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction over an action to compel or stay arbitration merely because the underlying claim raises a federal question. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:33 pm
We assume, for argument’s sake, that the precedent is correct in that context (a matter this Court itself has not decided and does not now decide). [read post]