Search for: "MERRELL v. U.S." Results 341 - 354 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 262 (N.D.Ga. 1985), aff’d and rev’d in part on other grounds, 788 F.2d 741 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 950 (1986); Barrow v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in which the Supreme Court first tried to evict "junk science," at least from the federal courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
” Research and exonerations by DNA analysis have repeatedly disproved these claims, and the U.S. [read post]