Search for: "MERRELL v. U.S." Results 341 - 360 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by Gene Quinn
McKeown Leo Mazur Trent Merrell James Mintz Andre Nel Henry Notthaft Mark Nowotarski Sue D. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, has solidified that trend. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993). [8]  Bench Book at 10. [9]  Id. at 10. [10]  Id. at 10. [11] See State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. ch. 113, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases.[6]” The court in Ladd Furniture v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
CONFOUNDING1 Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems courts experienced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am by Schachtman
Id. at 374 (relying upon and quoting from Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am by Schachtman
” Id. at 374 (relying upon and quoting from Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 89 F.3d 594, 596-98 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming exclusion of Dr. [read post]