Search for: "MILLER v. DOE et al" Results 341 - 358 of 358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Oliver et al (2008) published a comprehensive review of developments and future outlooks for pre-harvest food safety this month. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Miller, was quite surprised how a Canadian court proceeded and made several observations: The first thing that is impressed upon the American spectator is isolation of the prisoner. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
What VAWA Does Right The VAWA reauthorization bill provides funding for critical services and includes important law reform that will improve women’s access to justice. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
What VAWA Does Right The VAWA reauthorization bill provides funding for critical services and includes important law reform that will improve women’s access to justice. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Indeed, a typical “journal” will most likely look very different years from now than it does today. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by admin
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 6:24 am by Marty Lederman
The (narrower) arguments the United States and Israel are now making are, instead, that the ICC does not have jurisdiction (i) because Palestine is not a State at all as a matter of international law (an argument that Israel, but not the United States, offers in its brief) and (ii) because, at a minimum, Palestine is not, and has never been, a State entitled under international law to prescribe, adjudicate, or enforce criminal law against Israeli nationals. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]