Search for: "Mann v Does" Results 341 - 360 of 551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2013, 9:28 am by Leiza Dolghih
Johnson, 209 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. 2006) and Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Becausethis case does not involve a suit by citizens againsta State, there is no sovereign immunity issue here.Chou v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Baby Girl, in which the Court held that the Indian Child Welfare Act does not bar the termination of the biological father’s parental rights. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am by Conor McEvily
At this blog, Ronald Mann reports on Monday’s decision in Bowman v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm by Florian Mueller
For example, the commercial value of the patent could differ as a result of amendments, and if as a result of an amendment the patent was no longer standard-essential, this could have implications for Nokia and HTC's entitlement to a license on FRAND terms (and their desire to take a license).Justice Mann's order does not elaborate on his skeptical position on Nokia's proposal to await the CJEU's opinion on the questions a German court (the Düsseldorf Regional Court) referred… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
That does not tell me whether the hockey stick is or isn't bogus, but it does tell me something about Mann that makes me very reluctant to trust anything he writes. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
(The public does not think well of filibusters, and in days past, before C-Span, the public was seldom aware when they occurred, and disdainful when they did. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miracle Ctr., Inc., 87 AD3d 1094, 1096-1097; Kopelowitz & Co., Inc. v Mann, 83 AD3d 793, 797). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:37 pm by Venkat
I'm not sure exactly what the basis was for requiring Mann to turn over the log-in credentials and the court does not discuss the basis of the state court injunction. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Mann thinks so, and has threatened to sue if NRO does not remove the offending blog post. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
In the circumstances of the present case, I consider that that does amount to special grounds, at least viewed in combination with the other factors. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Attorneys are free to select among reasonable courses of action in prosecuting clients’ cases without thereby exposing themselves to liability for malpractice (Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]