Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 341 - 360
of 10,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 6:47 am
Patent and Trademark Office found there are no "conflicting marks" between the two logos [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 2:34 am
While there was no evidence of actual harm suffered by Redd, the defendants had opted for a corporate name for a new business which conflicted with an existing trade mark on the trade mark register; "Red" was not the name of anyone connected with the defendants, and they didn't draw the attention of the public to the fact that they were a firm of licensed conveyancers rather than real solicitors. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:15 am
OK, then.BMF used BMF Wheels as its mark for aluminum wheels for trucks and SUVs, and registered BMF Wheels as a word mark for same. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 1:43 pm
Some are reputable and generate positive results, others are simply ineffective, but still, do no harm besides wasting a lawyer's money. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:44 am
Tarnishment is defined as an association that harms the famous mark’s reputation. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am
KCG IP Holdings LLC, Cancellation No. 92055228 (July 10, 2013) [not precedential].The theory behind the Morehouse defense is that one party cannot be harmed by the issuance to, or existence of a registration of, a second party if the second party already owns a registration for essentially the same mark for essentially the same goods or services. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:23 am
Koetl granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ cybersquatting claim, but denied the motion to dismiss the other Lanham Act-related claims that the defendants’ “Manhattan Elite Prep” mark for test preparation services infringed the plaintiff’s “Manhattan Prep” and “Manhattan Prep” marks. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:35 am
Janis & Mark A. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
Jurisdiction for a foreign (to the defendant) court is not based on the place where “the harmful event occurred” (per Brussels I, with this extending to the place where damage was felt), but more specifically is confined to "the Member State in which the act of infringement has been committed or threatened" as stated in Article 97(5) of the Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Insurers only pay the insured party due to injury/harm to the insured party. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:34 pm
Apartment owners are required by law to protect residents and guests from all foreseeable harm. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:36 pm
Stay strong, attorney Mark Blane. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:45 am
EUR 2550; or (2) where the act is repeated or causes significant harmful effects, it shall be punishable by a term of imprisonment of five to eight years and a fine of approx. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:13 am
No, the core brand isn't harmed. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
James Beck (assisted by Mark Herrmann) goes up against liberal proceduralist Stephen Burbank in a multi-round debate (PDF) at Penn Law's PENNumbra, and survives to tell the tale. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:33 am
The harm must be proximately caused by the fraudulent registration; CEFCU argued that its rights were not dependent on the date of the registration and that this dispute would be happening anyway, thus there was no proximate causation. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
No luck for Apple on its tarnishment claim either: "Apple speculates that Amazon's App Store will allow inappropriate content, viruses, or malware to enter the market, but it is not clear how that will harm Apple's reputation, since Amazon does not offer apps for Apple devices. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:53 am
Thousands of competitors in an annual charitable event located on Florida’s Sunshine Skyway Bridge were almost placed in harm’s way over the weekend after an alleged drunk driver from Sarasota bypassed several safety barricades along the race route and crashed into a marked police SUV at a rest area Sunday morning. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 7:00 pm
"Coaches Could Face Liability on Student Concussions, Appeals Court Rules": At the "School Law" blog of Education Week, Mark Walsh has a post that begins, "A federal appeals court has ruled that coaches or other school personnel may be liable when they expose student-athletes to further harm by having them return to play after a suspected concussion. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:10 am
Last year, the Day One Report on noncompetes which Mark Lemley and... [read post]
