Search for: "Mark May"
Results 341 - 360
of 65,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Rather, it had to be shown that the public reliedon the mark as indicating the origin of the goods. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:00 pm
Following the implementation of the EU trade mark regulation (EUTMR) on March 29, 2016, an EU registered trade mark may now be infringed by use of that trade mark as a trade or company name or as part of a trade or company name. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:00 pm
Following the implementation of the EU trade mark regulation (EUTMR) on March 29, 2016, an EU registered trade mark may now be infringed by use of that trade mark as a trade or company name or as part of a trade or company name. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:29 am
Longer term, some / many may want to return to offices. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 11:13 am
In a post titled West Boca principal faces debate over second speech, the Sun-Sentinel suggested that Principal Mark Stenner may have copied material that was used in his 2014 graduation speech, a separate matter from the copying in his 2015 speech.There is an issue here, although copying in speeches may draw less scrutiny than copying in academic papers and theses. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 1:49 pm
Or if you can't be bothered to visit the site then just click the title of the dissertation below to download it:"Ownership of Intellectual Property in the Virtual World its real world effects and justification: focusing on UK/EC Trade Mark Law"I look forward to hearing any views you may have on it. var addthis_pub="bevans1986"; [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
" Regarding the use of "may be covered" language in marking, the Court stated that "it is highly questionable whether such a statement could be made 'for the purpose of deceiving the public,' when the public would not reasonably be deceived into believing the products were definitely covered by a patent. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
The product may be marked with “pat. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
United States’ brief strikes a tone that will resonate with most false marking defendants and may foreshadow the clarification of the high standard for pleading false marking that these defendants have been asserting in countless Rule 12(b)(6) motions over the last year. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:47 am
An Open Letter to the Harvard Law Review" (from Mark Lemley) May... [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 18, 2017 - 1 PM: In re Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Serial No. 86092589 [Section 2(d) refusal of MANHATTAN for "upholstered furniture"in view of the registered mark MANHATTAN CABINETRY for “custom designed and crafted furniture].May 23, 2017 - 2 PM: In re Sweetwater Brewing Company LLC, Serial No. 86587130 [Section 2(d) refusal of WHIPLASH WHITE IPA for "ale; beer" in view of the registered mark WHIPLASH for “wine," and… [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:15 am
Mark Arruda et al Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00800-TWP-DKLFile Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2013Plaintiff: Richard N. [read post]
12 May 2017, 7:36 pm
Alcatel-Lucent Long Term Disability Plan (10th Cir., May 9, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Alcatel-Lucent because there had been no abuse of discretion in the denial of disability below)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Pimpo was thwarted in his attempt to register the mark RAMBLER for automobiles and parts. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
To briefly recap, Congress enacted the false marking statute (35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:13 am
Framing the Right to Counsel in Immigration Proceedings: Law and Society 2014 Recap Mark Noferi Visiting Associate Fellow, Center for Migration Studies (2013-14) On Friday, May 30, 2014, I chaired a panel called “Framing the Right to Counsel in Immigration... [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:20 am
Expressions: Korean Entertainment Law Definition of “Author” under Korean Copyright Act: Entertainment Law Cases in Korea _____Sean Hayes may be contacted at: SeanHayes@ipglegal.com. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:23 am
Sandford may have been constitutionally correct…. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:00 pm
The value may be in the content, in the quality of writing, or in revealing something about our opposition. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:34 am
In a counterclaim filed May 17, 2010, Oakley, Inc., a sport sunglasses manufacturer, is accused of marking its products with hundreds of patents that were either:(i) expired,(ii) did not cover the marked products (e.g. patents on shoes and watches),(iii) were not owned by Oakley, or(iv) were non-existent.The counterclaim was filed by Suntech Optics, Inc. in response to accusations of infringement of patents D580963, 5387949, and 5638145.Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
