Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 341 - 360
of 720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Remember that under Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Remember that under Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:14 pm
We knew that in May 2007, a month after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
The bill exempts carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping pollutants from the Clean Air Act’s definition of “air pollutant,” overturning the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
By overturning the endangerment determination, the bill would override the Supreme Court’s landmark decision (Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:41 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:40 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Massachusetts v EPA says definitively that greenhouse gases are air pollutants, so the only other requirement for regulation under this section is the endangerment standard. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The question there is whether Justice Kennedy finds this case distinguishable in terms of standing from Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:15 am
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
See, e.g., Aaron Taggart & Wayne Blackmon, “Statistical base and background rates: the silent issue not addressed in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:02 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy may turn out to be the pivotal vote in the case, based on his vote in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:06 pm
Over the last year, these cases have served as fashion accessories to dress up the lobbying campaign aimed at getting Congress to overturn the Clean Air Act and block EPA from doing its job under the Supreme Court’s 2007 global warming decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
It is almost as if the Second Circuit was asking for it. 4) That said, the argument that some conservatives are now making on standing, i.e. that Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
If Justice Sotomayor recuses herself, the Court may end up deadlocked between the four Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:20 am
Though Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Second, I think standing here is distinguishable from Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
At least four justices thus seem ready to revisit the broad standing recognized for States in Massachusetts v. [read post]
