Search for: "Materials Co., Ltd." Results 341 - 360 of 1,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2020, 6:05 am by Derek Fincham
The dealers were announced in an unsealed Indictment in Manhattan federal court today: Erdal Dere of Fortuna Fine Arts Ltd., and his alleged “associate and co-conspirator” Faisal Khan. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
The onus remains on the applicant in the proceedings to satisfy the Court in light of the material relied upon, including any additional material relied upon, that leave ought to have been granted. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Law Lady
 Appeals -- Stay -- Automatic bankruptcy stay -- Appellate panel is bound by court's prior decision in Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Jordan House Ltd., which evaluated a frequent and well-known patron of a hotel who became intoxicated there contrary to liquor licensing legislation. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
What is the meaning and effect of the non-discrimination component of the FRAND undertaking and does it mean that materially the same licence terms as offered to Samsung must be offered to Huawei in the circumstances of the Unwired case? [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:42 am by Alex Woolgar
Celgard has secured an interim injunction to prevent the supply in the UK of battery separators manufactured by its rival, Senior, which are alleged to misuse Celgard's confidential information and/or trade secrets, in a High Court judgment from Mr Justice Trower (Celgard, LLC v Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd [2020] EWHC 2072 (Ch)). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
curid=21882537 Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr Justice Trower)  Celgard, LLC v Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd [2020] EWHC 2072 (Ch) (30 July 2020) This was an application by Celgard LLC ("Celgard") for an interim injunction to restrain Shenzhen Senior [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:11 pm
., Human Rights First Report;  Magnitsky legislation (UK Parliamentary materials); US Treasury Dept Magnitsky Act Resource Center; and in specific application The Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC): Xinjiang, its Uyghurs, and the Potential Expansion of Global Magnitsky Sanctions to Chinese Officials; Magnitsky Act: Raab to name first foreign citizens facing sanctions), has made compliance decisions much more complex, the the regulatory repercussions much more serious… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:29 pm by John Stigi
The Court rejected petitioners’ argument that the Court’s recent decision in Veriton Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:37 am by Giles Peaker
Taken together they provided material from which the inference could be drawn that the flat was being used for prostitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:00 am by Kristian Soltes
But L-1, which should be simpler to obtain,” said Chen Amit, co-founder and CEO of Tipalti, a San Mateo, Calif. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The courts involved evaded their gatekeeping duties and ignored the undue selectivity in reliance materials and the inadequacy and insufficiency of the challenged expert witness’s factual predicate. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Nicholas Saady
With the growth of franchises in our service sector and others modes of operation whereby major brands and corporations (“user companies”) have, as some claim, “off-loaded” their labor needs to other businesses who supply labor and other services to them (“supplier companies”), attention has increasingly turned to the “joint employer” doctrine of U.S. labor and employment law. [read post]