Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 341 - 360
of 19,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
When B. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
OJ EPO 2015, Supplementary publication No. 1, II.3) decided to enlarge its composition to three technically qualified members and two legally qualified members in accordance with Article 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) and Article 21(4)(b) EPC 1973.XII. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
(b) With respect to the requirement of inventive step, communication B contained on page 1 an introductory remark to the effect that an amendment of the claims based on the description as originally filed in order to arrive at inventive subject-matter seemed impossible. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Also, perhaps capacity is in tension with ©--the cultural association b/t creativity and madness is a long one. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 9:45 am
Judge Preska has entered an order granting the CFPB’s request for entry of a Rule 54(b) judgment to allow the CFPB to appeal her June 21 constitutionality ruling to the Second Circuit. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:30 am
B-10 to B-14. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
UK has a closed list of subject matter; you can’t protect something that isn’t on the list. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
The Examining Division decided that the subject-matter of claims 1 and 9 of the main request contained added subject-matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The OD’s approach reduced the relevance of A 100(b) to a mere reproduction of the specific examples. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
Typically, I pontificate and ramble about on securities compliance and regulatory matters, and don't discuss many business law issues here at BDLawBlog.com. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Curiously, there is an absolute judicial privilege for statements made in connection with and relevant to a judicial proceeding, so normally one wouldn't expect to find "defamatory matter" in a court filing. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am
As a matter of fact, the Enlarged Board has analysed and endorsed the established jurisprudence in point 26 of the reasons for the decision:"... [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:38 am
T. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the ground of opposition under A 100(b) prejudices the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:14 am
(If it’s not, I don’t think that matters—it’s not the case that false and misleading non-labeling material is immune from regulation under state law.) [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
In respect of this subject-matter the question thus arises whether in the present case the test of R 28(d) should be applied per analogiam and/or whether the balancing test developed in decision T 19/90 and endorsed by decision T 315/03 should be applied under A 53(a). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:48 pm
In addition, the Court also considered the needs and best interests of the respondent as well as the need to protect the community akin to Matter of Jeremy L., Matter of Justin H., Matter of Samantha T. and Matter of Ashlie B. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:01 pm
B SwindellHouse Judiciary Committee--other members: Rep. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
Running a B&B - a landlady's guide by Christabel MilnerThis is an absolute gem of a book, which I enjoyed reading very much. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Case Law, 6th edition, VII.E.16.4.1, and VII.E.16.5.4; cf. e.g. also T 33/07; T 321/07; T 1168/08; T 1634/09). [read post]
