Search for: "Maxwell v. Maxwell" Results 341 - 360 of 728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am by Brian Cordery
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Harwell (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Failure to Change Child Custody Reversed in Livingston Post-Divorce Matter: Maxwell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Ward (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Failure to Change Child Custody Reversed in Livingston Post-Divorce Matter: Maxwell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
Maxwell, an employee of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), assisted [Laiwala] by processing false DMV test scores, and Howard assisted in obtaining false Social Security numbers.People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 4:03 pm
Significant cases reported in English for the first time are * Sara Lee Meats Europe BV v Ladyberg SpA (Court of Bergamo, Italy) - infringement action involving invisible underwear for ladies and calculation of damages;Left: not all cats wear invisible underwear, it seems* Adidas International v FDB (Maritime and Commercial Court, Denmark) - yes, you've guessed it, it's another three-stripe case. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:34 am
Cases reported this time round include* The ETERNA trade mark dispute from Germany, on whether shirts bearing that trade mark and handed over to a forwarding agent in the European Union, in the false expectation that they would be exported outside the European Economic Area, have been first marketed in the European Union by the trade mark owner or with its consent;* The recent European Court of Human Rights decision that trade mark applications are protectable possessions, in Anheuser-Busch… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 37240 (ED CA, April 5, 2011), a California federal district court rejected claims by a civil detainee that his free exercise rights were violated when he was not permitted to participate in religious services while being held in jail.In Maxwell v. [read post]