Search for: "Michael Martin v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 751
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Ron Wyden, Mark Udall, and Martin Heinrich stated that, while the administration has claimed that bulk collection is necessary to prevent terrorism, they “have reviewed the bulk-collection program extensively, and none of the claims appears to hold up to scrutiny. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:48 am by WSLL
Michael, Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
On the journalism front, Wells noted the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Hedges v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:00 am by My name
Reliability and affordability, the two original goals of the EELV program, were the main focus.[14] Michael Gass, CEO of ULA, touted the 100% success rate for Delta IV and Atlas V launches and acknowledged the high cost of ULA’s launch services, but he insisted that ULA would work with the government to reduce costs.[15] SpaceX’s CEO, Elon Musk, argued that SpaceX could provide launch services for much lower prices – about $90 million per launch compared to an… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am by WSLL
Michael, Wyoming Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Profumo v Bradley (No.4) ([2014] WASC 94) Martin CJ dismissed a claim for slander in relation to statements made in the course of telephone conversations by the defendant (who is the plaintiff’s sister). [read post]