Search for: "Miller v. Paul" Results 341 - 360 of 580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
On 25 June 2010, Eady J will hear further applications in the libel case of Miller v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In response, plaintiff’s attorney, Paul Schietroma, indicated further discovery would be provided once his file was reconstructed. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE § 357 at 604 (1969)).Our standard of review in PRA cases is also de novo. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
In an amicus brief supporting DG, Notre Dame law professors Samuel Bray and Paul Miller argue that the Fourth Circuit embraced an excessively broad view of equitable principles that contravenes this Court’s precedents. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
A candid camera, Paul Lambert, New Law Journal N.L.J. (2010) Vol.160 No.7445 pg.1699-1700. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:39 am by Amy Howe
In commentary at Slate, Cristian Farias suggests that the Court’s recent decision in Heien v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
” Petitioner Kevin Rotkiske claims respondent Paul Klemm obtained a default judgment against him for a debt by improperly serving Rotkiske at a former address, where an addressee unknown to him purported to accept service on Rotkiske’s behalf. [read post]