Search for: "NY Administrative Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 11:00 pm
And when the New York County Supreme Court ended up dismissing his challenge, LR appealed.On its review, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that Officer LR’s injury wasn’t the kind that was subject to coverage by local law – to wit: Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division held that a New York State public employer met its prima facie burden of showing that there were no triable issues of fact that would support plaintiff's petition alleging age discrimination within the meaning of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296[1][a]), as there was no indication that the employer's actions concerning… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division held that a New York State public employer met its prima facie burden of showing that there were no triable issues of fact that would support plaintiff's petition alleging age discrimination within the meaning of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296[1][a]), as there was no indication that the employer's actions concerning… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
Courts have the power and the duty to make certain that an administrative official or body has not acted in excess of the grant of authority given by statute2015 NY Slip Op 04712, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Civil Service Law §75 hearing officer found the employee [Employee] guilty of two of the three charges of alleged misconduct and recommended that the penalty of termination be imposed. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
Courts have the power and the duty to make certain that an administrative official or body has not acted in excess of the grant of authority given by statute2015 NY Slip Op 04712, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Civil Service Law §75 hearing officer found the employee [Employee] guilty of two of the three charges of alleged misconduct and recommended that the penalty of termination be imposed. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 2:38 pm
In affirming a decision of New York County Supreme Court Justice Jane Solomon, it was declared that the administrators of the estate of the plaintiffs' late son had no right to the semen specimens deposited in the defendant tissue bank and the administrators would also not be entitled to an injunction against the destruction of the specimens. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel does not bar litigating claims involving the same parties that were not previously considered in prior administrative or judicial actionsMehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 2017 NY Slip Op 06416, Appellate Division, First DepartmentFollowing a number of adverse administrative rulings, Surana Mehulic brought an Article 78 action against her former employer, New York Downtown Hospital [Hospital] alleging it had impermissibly… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:45 am
The court held that concern about privacy of students and administrators did not justify a ban on video taping. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
District Court of the Southern District. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 8:49 pm
In addition, Nathan Kelley, Acting Chief Administrative Judge,... [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 8:03 pm
American Conference Institute (ACI) will be holding is 9th Annual Summit on Biosimilars on June 25-27, 2018 in New York, NY. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
THE NY TIMES REPORTED TODAY:In a stinging rejection of one of the Bush administration's central assertions about the scope of executive authority to combat terrorism, a federal appeals court ordered the Pentagon to release a man being held as an enemy combatant. [read post]
6 May 2017, 8:45 pm
American Conference Institute (ACI) will be holding is 8th Annual Summit on Biosimilars on June 12-14, 2017 in New York, NY. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
However, the court found that the fact that Ranco could not recoup the costs incurred and time spent on conducting a DEIS to be sufficient, without more, to distinguish Ranco’s case from any other preliminary administrative action. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Eichenholtz, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel for Employment Policy and Litigation, who served as a final reviewer for Citywide Panel determinations," was appropriately considered by Supreme Court, as "there was no administrative hearing" and the affirmation "explain(ed) the information that was before the agency," including it noting that the DOE Position Statement was submitted to the Citywide Panel and was relied upon for the final appeal… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Eichenholtz, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel for Employment Policy and Litigation, who served as a final reviewer for Citywide Panel determinations," was appropriately considered by Supreme Court, as "there was no administrative hearing" and the affirmation "explain(ed) the information that was before the agency," including it noting that the DOE Position Statement was submitted to the Citywide Panel and was relied upon for the final appeal… [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 10:07 am
However, based on comments reported in the article attributed to Chief Administrative Judge A. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:09 pm
Matter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I,... [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:28 am
The Court concluded that the NY corporation was administered in Italy because the manager was domiciled in Italy, and the corporation's accounting books, commercial contracts, and minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors were all located in Italy. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:00 am
Housing Authority, 2009 NY Slip Op 00440, (1st Dep't January 17, 2009), the court announced that the federal standard for sexual harassment claims - in the absence of proof of tangible job detriment the complainant must show that she was subjected to "severe or pervasive" acts of harassment - does not apply to claims brought under the City Human Rights Law. [read post]
