Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
FMR LLC, a divided Supreme Court confirmed that the whistleblower protection of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act extends to employees who work for contractors of public companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
The Court interpreted Sarbanes Oxley's whistleblower retaliation provision:No [public] company . . . , or any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company, may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of [whistleblowing or other protected activity].18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:52 am
The language relating to whistleblower protection specifically states that it applies to public companies, or officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents of such companies. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:03 am
They have called out their lawyers, their law professors and their corporate officers all to talk about their vast experience with eDiscovery and the monumentally unfair burden placed on corporations by the current rules. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:42 am
A CEO receives an anonymous call claiming that someone is stealing company trade secrets or that an employee is taking kickbacks from a vendor. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:36 pm
A CEO receives an anonymous call claiming that someone is stealing company trade secrets or that an employee is taking kickbacks from a vendor. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The leaders of the Securities and Exchange Commission addressed the public on February 21-22 at the annual SEC Speaks conference in Washington, D.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
A CEO receives an anonymous call claiming that someone is stealing company trade secrets or that an employee is taking kickbacks from a vendor. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
For example, Sarbanes-Oxley raised auditing standards, imposed certification requirements on public company officers and required enhanced internal controls for public companies. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
Previously, employees had to mail a written complaint, visit an OSHA office in-person, or place a telephone call to 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) or to one of OSHA’s Regional or Area offices. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Previously, employees had to mail a complaint, or visit or call an OSHA office. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Previously, employees had to mail a complaint, or visit or call an OSHA office. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
This is where the FACTA stepped in with its common sense exception to the FCRA by amending the FCRA to exempt from the definitions of a consumer report and investigative consumer report any report that otherwise would fall within that definition if: The communication is made to an employer in connection with an investigation that concerns either: (1) suspected misconduct relating to employment, or (2) compliance with federal, state or local laws and regulations, the rules of a self-regulatory… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
These restatements have declined in recent years through the quality controls instituted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 also requires executives to report within two business days to the Commission if they buy or sell their companies stock. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:03 am
FMR LLC, a case in which the Court is expected to clarify whether the whistleblower protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) cover employees of private companies that contract with public companies. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
FMR LLC, a case presenting the question whether the scope of Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection includes employees of contractors of public companies. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
The SEC’s Office of the General Counsel now is receiving referrals about potential attorney misconduct from the Enforcement Division on a regular basis. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
If Congress didn’t mean to protect those employees, they say, it wouldn’t have prohibited retaliation by “any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent” of “such [public] company. [read post]
