Search for: "P. v. Mai"
Results 341 - 360
of 19,805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
The Court of Appeal considered Aweys and R v Brent London Borough Council, ex p. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
That day, a motion was made to add "[t]he [V]ice-President and other Civil officers of the U. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
As ELB readers may recall, I flagged the Anderson issue back in October, and my briefing… Continue reading The post Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:39 am
It begins: After oral arguments at the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Tillman and I made that point expressly in our brief at p. 5. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Not long after ratification in 1869, Chief Justice Salmon P. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
(p. 9.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm
D.P. and B.P v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Indeed, in his reply brief (at p.19), Trump says in no uncertain terms that “President Trump is not arguing that section 3 is ‘non-self-executing. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
Harper claim may really be legally meritless) appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
" (P. 8). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
It is well understood that national laws, while stemming from the same EPC and CPC underpinnings, may be different in practice to each other and to how those prescribed in Part V of the UPC Agreement come to be interpreted by the new court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
In his article, "Queer Trademarks," Michael P. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Leaving the quest for both “ knowledge ” and “ disability ” date up to the trial judge may bring unexpected results, such as that which occurred in the Penrose case. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
Great A&P Tea Co. v. [read post]
