Search for: "People v Barnes" Results 341 - 360 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
Accufix Research Inst., Inc., 253 F.3d 1180, 1195-96, amended, 273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001); Barnes, 161 F.3d at 143-46; Boughton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:33 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Currently, 42% of summoned people fail to respond. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:19 am by SHG
” Criticism of college officials is protected speech, unless it contains “overt threats,” according to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in Barnes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
 At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm by Giles Peaker
  Interviews will be held at the Barnes office in south west London. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
(Robin Barnes, in her book, Outrageous Invasions, gives some striking examples of US cases in which such a public interest has been asserted – including cases where the interactions of paramedics with dying patients have been broadcast – in the interests of dispelling the argument.) [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6300 Barnes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of the 50th anniversary of Loving v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
"Recreational dancing is not a form of expression protected by the federal or state constitutions," the court wrote.But, according to the plurality of the SCOTUS in Barnes v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:37 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court Considers Whether Lab Analysts Should Testify at Trial: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports the Supreme Court Tuesday again considered whether the people who conduct forensic tests for law enforcement must be available for questioning at trial. [read post]