Search for: "People v Jr." Results 341 - 360 of 2,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Examples of overt disruption: Stewart v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:45 am by Tom Smith
As a former executive director and CEO of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and a statewide youth assistant to Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1960s, I believe this ruling presents one of the most significant wins for civil rights in decades. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
As I and others predicted at the time, the EO–now repealed–had zero material legal effect on Section 230 (though it keeps inspiring people who irrationally hate the “Tech Giants” more than they hate government censorship). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 (Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Powe, Jr., Regulating Broadcast Programming 240–74 (1994); Samples, supra note 38, text accompanying nn.47–48. [93] NBC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm by Carla Laroche
The case came to the court after Charles Borden Jr. pleaded guilty to violating a federal law barring people convicted of a felony from possessing a firearm. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In its unanimous opinion delivered by Chief Justice Edward Douglass White Jr. on June 21, 1915, the Supreme Court ruled in Guinn v. [read post]