Search for: "People v. Miranda" Results 341 - 360 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
Hamdan was not judged by a jury of his peers and he received no Miranda warning about his rights. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
Fortunately that changed and another great change came onto the legal environment in the name of Miranda v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by The Charge
The better known version, Miranda v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
Hardly any topic is more ubiquitous these days than Lin-Manuel Miranda’s smash musical. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
It’s the most powerful of the rights that originated with Miranda v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  What made this case difficult was that the Supreme Court had said repeatedly in the years that followed its decision in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:56 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Recording of Phone Conversation Did Not Breach Constitutional, Other Rights or Implicate 'Miranda' United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm by Danielle Wild
"In the second, People v Jones (2015 NY Slip Op 09773), the defendant appealed from a judgment of conviction for attempted rape and other crimes. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:11 am by SHG
  His last name is Melendez-Diaz, as in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am by Jeff Gamso
Some people focus on the silver lining.Justice Stevens' opinion (sorry, Bennett, I prefer the visual aesthetic of omitting that final "s") in Padilla v. [read post]