Search for: "People v. Richard" Results 341 - 360 of 3,643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Kant may have believed that a system could be designed that would force even devils, as “rational actors,” to serve the public good, but few people agree. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
Part of the challenge stems from the fact that we may be moving to what Richard Hasen calls a "post-truth era" for election law, where rapid technological change and hyperpolarization are "call[ing] into question the ability of people to separate truth from falsity. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
See also Albert, supra note 5; Richard Albert, Constitutional Handcuffs, 42 Ariz. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
Constitutional change can come very quickly, and as I've paraphrased Richard Posner many times, if changing judges changes law, do we know what law is? [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Some of them are, both metaphorically and, increasingly literally, old friends, but thanks especially to Richard, I am also meeting some new people and, I hope, making brand-new friends, not infrequently from abroad. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm by Anna Bower
A special master will help the parties “find a path forward,” he contends, and allow for greater confidence in the investigative process on the part of the American people. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm by INFORRM
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am by Ezra Rosser
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Trade Comm’n, Internet Site Agrees to Settle FTC Charges of Deceptively Collecting Personal Information in Agency’s First Internet Privacy Case (Aug. 13, 1998), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press- releases/1998/08/internet-site-agrees-settle-ftc-charges-deceptively-collecting-personal-information-agencys-first. 2 NEIL RICHARDS, WHY PRIVACY MATTERS 84 (2021). [read post]