Search for: "People v. Royale"
Results 341 - 360
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 4:06 am
The trial of the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins concluded on Wednesday 1 March 2017, Day 3 of the trial before Mr Justice Warby in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
#3: People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
If the lengthy incubation has produced a swan, it is one whose feathers are already looking distinctly ruffled following the CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, issued three weeks after Royal Assent. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
If the lengthy incubation has produced a swan, it is one whose feathers are already looking distinctly ruffled following the CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, issued three weeks after Royal Assent. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
Marines what Patrick O’Brian did for the Royal Navy. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
The royal prerogative was created and exists for the purpose of giving effect to the referendum. 15.55 On the AV referendum, Eadie QC says that this needed provisions in legislation to work out what the consequences would be following the vote. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that the Government’s attempt to effect these changes using the royal prerogative offends the imperative rule of our constitution. 15.18 The Lord Advocate for the Scottish Government, the Rt Hon W. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Surveillance The RPC blog has examined the Investigatory Powers Bill after it was given royal assent by the Queen. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
Consult with people with disabilities for accommodation ideas. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
The case is styled Secretary of State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
… Western Canada Business Litigation BlogSCC Rules Debtors Impliedly Consented to Disclosure of Mortgage Discharge Statement On November 17, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”) released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
