Search for: "People v. Washington (1990)"
Results 341 - 360
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
Twenty years before Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
We heard the same predictions in 1990 when we strengthened the Clean Air Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
Gay rights advocates have been pressing in the courts for the right to marry since the early 1990s, beginning with a test case in Hawaii, Baehr v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Doe A. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
As social creatures, they are subject to the same pushes and pulls of social psychology that explain most people. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
South Carolina (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
She grew up on the family’s Lazy B Ranch, which sat astride the border between Arizona and New Mexico and occupied about 250 square miles – almost four times the size of Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
People were shown pictures of police officers in their traditional uniforms and in BDUs. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
By the early 1990s, digital registries such as the Art Loss Register (ALR) and commissions like the Commission for Art Recovery were established worldwide, specifically focusing on the identification of stolen artworks. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Giving Goliath the slingshot: Review of the National Innovation System on 'the costs of enforcing IP rights': (Australia & New Zealand Intellectual Property Law), Take patent policy away from lawyers, says Australian government report: (IAM), Advisory Council announces review of scope of patentable subject matter: (International Law Office), Federal Court's flu shot for patent law: Notice to Practitioners - Proceedings under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth):… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
The caveat makes sense, but it clearly was never intended to be some sort of bright-line rule for people too lazy to look at the actual studies and data. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:25 pm
” Not to mention the lawsuit against Pittsburg in the mid-1990s, one in Mississippi in 2001, and more mentioned here. [read post]
