Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas"
Results 341 - 360
of 629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
(IP Tango) (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (IP Tango) CAFC to look at admissibility of new evidence for BPAI appeals: Hyatt v Kappos (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) Global Global - General Developing IP in countries with weak IPR’s...? [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on worksharing… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on worksharing… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Peter C. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
Thus, even though Joe Blow wasn't a party to Texas v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
JonesCase Number: 15-cv-00438 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas)Date Filed: June 10, 2015Date of Qualifying Order/Judgment: March 21, 2016 4/29/2016 7/28/2016 2016-56 SEC v. eCareer Holding, Inc., eCareer, Inc., Joseph J. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI), (KEI),… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: $388 million verdict against Microsoft overturned (Ars Technica) (IP Law Observer) Briefs filed at US Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
– IPReg rumour (IPKat) EWHC finds infringement of copyright in Nine Miles Down screenplay: Surjit Singla v Thomas Hedman & Ors (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General USTR Special 301 report: business as usual (Public Knowledge) US Patent Reform House Judiciary Committee is less than enamoured with Senate Manager’s Amendment (Inventive Step) Startups push Congress to maintain one-year ‘grace period’ for patent reform (Peter… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:21 am
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(IPEG) USPTO reform at WIPO: New PCT procedures being proposed for PCT II (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) WIPO Patent Cooperation Committee to proceed with study of PCT with constraints (Intellectual Property Watch) Developing a foreign filing strategy (Intellectual Property Watch) Want to obtain patents to protect you from competitors knocking off your innovative products or technology? [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]
