Search for: "Pharms v. U.s.*"
Results 341 - 360
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
Chugai Pharm. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm
Bradford Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Teva Pharms. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
The outcome in Acorda v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
Digital Sys. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589 (1993). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
Sanofi as well as with the likely upcoming petition in Novartis Pharm. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
Medicis Pharm. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Novo Nordisk Pharms. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Novo Nordisk Pharms. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:07 am
Aventis Pharm., Inc., 468 F.3d 1366, 1381 (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Andrx Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1226 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Corop. v. [read post]
