Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Texas, Fort Worth Division.May 16, 2017.FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEHAL R. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am
Previously, and relying on the Court’s opinion in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:58 am
Peruta v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion in Novartis AG v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:47 pm
Clive Phillips The Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico issued an opinion in New Mexico v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm
That lifestyle is based upon sexual orientation and gender identity that the United States Supreme Court has recently recognized. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:03 am
In Cartes v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:59 am
In Phillips v U.S., the defendant had been charged with numerous drug related offenses and with being a felon in possession of ammunition. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:59 am
In Phillips v U.S., the defendant had been charged with numerous drug related offenses and with being a felon in possession of ammunition. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:15 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, but it ultimately resolved that case on another ground, holding that the ATS does not apply to violations that occur outside the United States. [read post]
