Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
He favorably quotes Justice Scalia's memorable statement from Bendix Autolite Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch client Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce offered the following statements today regarding the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Sebelius, by construing the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act as a tax in order to avoid the constitutional issues posed by treating it as an exercise of the commerce power.1 The Court also invoked the canon in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
Dorf, the Robert S. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
“E-commerce has grown into a significant and vibrant part of our national economy against the backdrop of established rules, including the physical-presence rule,” Roberts said. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:18 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and the part of McConnell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:19 am
In Leachco, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm
– Chief Justice John Roberts, benchslapping the dissents by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
Information, commerce, goods, and services now move freely and rapidly throughout the globe. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
Robert W. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:51 pm
Robert G. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm
And, as we all know, the Supreme Court expressly rejected this proposition in Lopez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
-v- Powers) that the 2006 federal law requiring state sex offenders to register with law-enforcement officials when they move across state lines was largely a local issue.The ruling, made in two unrelated sex-offender cases pending in Orlando, led to the dismissal of charges against Robert D. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:10 am
Last Thursday, in Arthrex v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Roberts thought there was a substantial burden on interstate commerce. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:08 am
Wednesday’s argument in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
