Search for: "Reed v. Rule" Results 341 - 360 of 1,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2021, 12:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's decision by Judge Reed O'Connor in Greer's Ranch Cafe v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am by Mara Curtis and Mona Razani
Prior to the Dynamex ruling, courts applied the multi-factor Borello balancing test to determine the status of a worker. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
A panel made up of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows will decide whether, following the decision in Merricks v MasterCard [2020] UKSC 51, the winds of group litigation continue to blow in a pro-consumer direction. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 6:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Reed, “an intent to exclude coverage must be expressed in clear and unambiguous language. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In reviewing the issue of admissibility of the expert’s opinion, the court reviewed Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 702 and the case of Frye v. [read post]