Search for: "SMITH v. WOODS" Results 341 - 360 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
There had been various errors that may have arisen through “poor communication or misunderstanding”, but Wood Ch stated that that was immaterial since: “[4]. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The implications of the decision, which clarified the application of articles 8 and 10 of the Convention to determine the propriety of such powers, extend to the recently enforced Investigatory Powers Act 2018, as noted by the Cyberleagle Blog, Press Gazette and Graham Smith via INFORRM. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) (see our blog here) the defendant blogger’s public interest defence failed because he did not adequately plead and prove that he had believed it was in the public interest to publish the statement complained of. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Although a previous BAP panel decision had rejected application of § 548 to similar state law disclaimers, Wood v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cathay Smith: Do you foresee a point in time at which an AI might be able to make a fair use/fair dealing decision in the moment? [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(IP finance) Existing sources of investment information failed us: patent landscaping analytics provide necessary innovation for investors (IP Asset Maximiser Blog) Global - Copyright Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) Curt Smith discusses cc-licensing (creativecommons.org) Kelly Link on creative commons (creativecommons.org) Africa EU-Africa partnership aims at knowledge access, technology transfer (Intellectual… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
According to the NRA (American Rifleman, Jan. 1988), the Metzenbaum bill covered many derringers (up to .38 caliber) as well as .22 or .25 caliber handguns from companies including Beretta, Colt, North American Arms, Raven Arms, Rossi, Smith & Wesson, Stevens, and Walther. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
A few years ago I was doing some work for a professional association on guidelines for dealing with litigants without counsel and I was struck by the extent to which some legal professionals regard litigants without counsel as interlopers who gum up the finely tuned, well-oiled machine that is their justice system. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
  The government’s cover letter explains that it is going forward with the proposal despite yesterday’s decision in the Microsoft case in the Second Circuit (discussed by Andrew Woods here), but lays down a pretty clear marker that it will be addressing that decision soon. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Steve Hall
Thursday's inquiry began with an aggressive attack on a deputy state fire marshal's 1991 investigation into the fire at Willingham's house.Florida fire expert John Lentini attacked the findings of Manuel Vasquez, now deceased, in which Vasquez cited what he said were 20 indicators of arson at the small, wood-framed house. [read post]