Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 341 - 360
of 23,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2008, 5:54 pm
Plaintiff is an apparel company named Derek Andrew, Inc. that sells a high-end (read: expensive) clothing line called "Twisted Heart" at Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Neiman Marcus. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:14 am
As part of its drive to show foreign investors that Russia is a safe and profitable place to put their money, a government-owned bank has established a private equity fund with a former Goldman Sachs banker in charge and Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:28 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:20 pm
Juicy Couture sues Lime Blue, owner of juicycampus.com, a college gossip site which has allegedly been selling JUICY CAMPUS apparel. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:43 am
" Milo & Gabby, LLC et al v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:45 pm
Which isn't nonsense, but Wurman blows the other folks off pretty quickly.In any event, having now convinced you (Wurman seems to think), the only real question is whether originalism supports Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
The case of Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC is fast approaching poster-child status as an illustration of the headaches that can follow from poorly drafted valuation criteria in the buy-sell provision of a shareholders' or operating agreement. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
In Tanner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:35 pm
Warren V. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:38 am
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2008] UKHL 54; [2008] WLR (D) 281 “The expenditure on a warehouse building which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building and therefore did not qualify as a capital allowance under s 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:37 pm
Yesterday, in Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:48 pm
NOT CHARGED – Criminal Damage, State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:34 pm
Noonan -- Minerva and Hologic, competitors selling devices used for ablating uterine endometrial tissue, are notable for their dispute last year that gave the Supreme Court an opportunity to reassess an established patent law doctrine, assignor estoppel (reminiscent of the Court's review of the Federal Circuit's standard for obviousness in KSR Int'l v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:41 pm
Noonan -- If you have ever wondered how popular eyelash enhancers like RevitaLash and Latisse produce their effects, Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:14 am
On October 29, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC, 2009 NY Slip Op 31901(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Aug. 14, 2009), recently decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:40 pm
Giersch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
") SC19135 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
Briefly, the Court says that claims of Native Hawaiians that the State of Hawaii could not sell or otherwise alienate lands in the state, based on the wrongfulness of... [read post]
