Search for: "Sides v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 24,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:59 am
The Fifth Circuit today sided with the Fourth (Home Concrete & Supply LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
With regard to the state’s reliance on Ward v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
The Court of Errors sided with Ogden. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
Lewis, Case No. 16-285, and Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 4:36 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:39 am
As Justice Scalia stated in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm
In a brief per-curium, or unsigned, order, the Court dismissed United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:46 am
The case is Kodrin v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am
We are pleased to welcome fellow blogger and attorney Charley Foster from Planet Kauai in a discussion of State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
Vance invoked Marshall's decision opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:27 am
One side vowed to battle until every... [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Former Governor Schwarznegger's State Labor Commissioner Angela Bradstreet had raised some eyebrows among the plaintiffs' bar by backing the employer side in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
It probably was not a good sign for Texas in Banister v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
The latest California Verdict Search (reports available in paper version only) reports a defense verdict in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (that's San Diego) in a case called Wawanesa General Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:16 pm
A separate case Ramos v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
Finally, the Board side stepped the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]