Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 341 - 360
of 46,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
The case would have been almost perfect for the EC to seek the first interim measures, so TikTok was probably very wise to back down quickly. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Susan V. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
I can’t bring myself to go back and blog that opinion now. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:10 am
Yesterday the Arizona legislature gave final passage to HB2677 (full text) which repeals Arizona's 160-year-old near-total abortion ban that, according to the state Supreme Court, came back into effect when Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
The Court reviewed HK legislative history and 1950s HK case law and held that the HK colonial legislature decided ‘consciously’ back in 1938 against including an intention to incite violence as a necessary ingredient of the statutory ‘seditious intention’ offences [paras 81, 82]. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
The vote follows a ruling by Arizona’s Supreme Court that the 159-year-old law banning abortion was enforceable in the aftermath of the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn abortion rights case Roe v Wade, sending a 52-year-old case back to trial court. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:39 am
Simpson v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:55 am
In Hood v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Fourth Estate v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Sebelius was back in 2012. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
A webpage (still available on the Way-Back machine)[9] described the proposed movie as Erin Brockovich meets The Verdict. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]