Search for: "State v. Bingham"
Results 341 - 360
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 12:53 pm
United States). [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am
Following the Court of Appeal decision in Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 Q.B. 283, 300) per Bingham LJ: ‘The law would part company with the realities of life if it held that the damage caused by publication of a libel began and ended with publication to the original publishee. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm
Sir John Dyson explained the substance of this right at paragraph 59 by quoting from Lord Bingham in A v Head Teacher and Governors of Lord Grey School [2006] UKHL 14, paragraph 24: [The right to education] was intended to guarantee fair and non-discriminatory access to that system by those within the jurisdiction of the respective states … But the guarantee is, in comparison with most other Convention guarantees, a weak one, and deliberately so. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
See also the observation of Bingham LJ (as he then was) in Slipper v BBC that ‘Defamatory statements are objectionable not least because of their propensity to percolate through underground channels and contaminate hidden springs’ (1991] 1 QB 283, 300.) [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
And in the same case, Lord Bingham noted that ‘it has been repeatedly and rightly said that what engages the interest of the public may not be material which engages the public interest’. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
Secondly, the Court stated [66] that while the prosecution and defence arguments may be of assistance to the judge, there are interests – presumably the interest in open justice – that they cannot always adequately represent: ‘… there are some cases, of which the present… may be an example, where the judge would be greatly assisted by an independent lawyer assigned to provide assistance in the same way as in the present case both the [trial] judge and this… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:50 am
More secret justice on the horizon Angus McCullough QC special advocate for Russian cleared of spying in deportation case Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Bingham. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Bingham. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
”1 Rost v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:51 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:01 am
In John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586, [1995] EWCA Civ 23 (12 December 1995) Lord Bingham MR said that such juries “were in the position of sheep loosed on an unfenced common, with no shepherd”. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
The full document is available here and our summary is here, and reflects the leading judgment of Lord Bingham (at 21) and the comments of Lord Hope (at 49) in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148. [read post]
