Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 341 - 360
of 15,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
The Court agreed and granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss stating: “SCDC argues that Plaintiff’s claim is barred because the state is immune from claims for money damages brought under Section 16(b). [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:13 am
The repercussions of the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in California Cannabis Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
*Accordingly, said the court, subdivisions (a), (b) and (c) of §296.1, of the Executive Law were inapplicable with respect to DOL and the State's Division of Human Rights lacked jurisdiction of over the matters alleged in Malcolm’s complaint with respect to that agency.* §292 of the Executive Law defines the terms “employer,” employment agency and labor organization for the purposes of Article 15, the… [read post]
7 May 2008, 8:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Ed. 2d 639 (1989); In re Juveniles A, B, C, D, E, 121 Wn.2d 80, 90, 847 P.2d 455 (1993); State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 3:12 am
., v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
More significantly, the Court in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders explicitly rejected the notion of shareholder primacy, stating, [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
C. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
Code § 23-4-7(b). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Diaz v. [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:29 am
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) whether Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence” as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:08 pm
The Court of Justice handed down a judgment in Case C-267/06 Tadao Maruko v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 pm
, United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:38 am
Teddy O’Brian’s, Inc., No. 14 C 3570, Slip Op. [read post]
