Search for: "State v. Hodge"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Hodges (Chief Justice John Roberts, dissenting). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Hodges. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:34 am
Hodges. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
The EHRC, intervening, had argued that Bubb could not longer stand in view of R (CN) v Lewisham LBC (2014) UK SC 62; (2015) AC 1259, and the judgment of Lord Hodge at (71) “71. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Hodges and perceived loose ends from Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 5:42 am
Citing Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm
Save during the first trimester, the state of pregnancy, and the birth of child is rarely a purely private matter. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:02 am
Dorf, Eugene Volokh, panelists. 35 Georgia State University Law Review 937-975 (2019). [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:27 am
Supreme Court required states to recognize same-sex marriages in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Lord Hodge expressed real reservations about the status relied on and the boundary of “other status” for the purposes of art 14, but was prepared to assume that in this case it was satisfied [126, 131]. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Wilson, with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Carnwath agreed; a concurring judgment was given by Lord Carnwath with whom Lord Reed and Lord Hughes agreed; a concurring judgment was also given by Lord Hodge with whom Lord Hughes agreed. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Hodges. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
