Search for: "State v. Lemon" Results 341 - 360 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
Often times, I have potential lemon law clients who contact my office for a free case review, stating to me that they were misled or misinformed by the car salesman or dealership -- they were told that the subject vehicle was assembled in the USA or Japan, when in fact, the vehicle originated in Mexico. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:27 am by Tejinder Singh
”  Today, we ask your thoughts about whether the Court will overrule Lemon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:32 am by Walter Olson
Archdiocese (2) Reins of power dept. (0) Podcast: The Role of State Attorneys General (0) Lawyers and White House nominations (0) [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:13 am by Paul Horwitz
 Seen in this light, the problem with the Lemon/endorsement test is not its flabbiness but that, if taken seriously, it would require much more separation of church and state than the Court's conservatives can stomach. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
Hardwick, which had held that same-sex intimacy is not a fundamental right, but Lawrence does not clearly state that it is a fundamental right; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:55 pm by Chris Bruni
In Joyce v Ford Motor Company, No. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  (The case was Mississippi State Conference of NAACP v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Stephen Wermiel
The Supreme Court has held that this separation should be gauged using the three-part test that it created forty years ago in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm by Robin Wilson
  The Court concluded that the statute violated the Establishment Clause, citing Lemon v. [read post]