Search for: "State v. Mark Marks, PA" Results 341 - 360 of 703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Sutherland, David Spiegelhalter & Mark Burgman, “Policy: Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims,” 503 Nature 335, 337 (2013). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
”  Slip op. at 17 n.15 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday (Day 76), the defence case of Rebekah Brooks’ former PA, Cheryl Carter, began. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
  [Defendant] satisfied its burden.Id. at 913 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Supp. 2d 477, 496-97 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted).The same result also occurred in an aspect of the Bartlett litigation that did not get appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, PA 45 was invalid and unenforceable under the change-of-purpose clause of Article IV, Sec. 24 (Toth v Callaghan, February 5, 2014, Goldsmith, M). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]