Search for: "State v. Robertson"
Results 341 - 360
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
State, No. 103,915 (Douglass)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Jessica R. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:01 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
There were a handful of resolved cases reported: Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
The reader might miss Siems’s subtle acknowledgement later on (which he does not quite state directly) that Robertson’s opinion was vacated by the D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Organ Donations Robertson, John A. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Judges Mukasey and Robertson have publicly articulated this view in emphatic terms.[9] I can hear many in the judicial branch saying that courts exist to resolve cases and controversies between parties, not to issue death warrants based on classified, ex parte submissions. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
Robertson (embezzlement and willful misapplication of tribal property)McGuire v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:16 pm
Employment lawyers across the state are describing Harris v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:50 pm
Tameny v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
See Robertson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Robertson, supra, 96 Cal.App.4th 884, and Salenga v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
Chatham County Hospital Authority, 145 Ga.App. 113, 115, 243 S.E.2d 269 (1978); Robertson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
In Fleet Boston Robertson Stephens, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:36 am
See, e.g., Robertson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am
Absent an express agreement, an attorney is not a guarantor of a particular result (see Byrnes v Palmer, 18 App Div at 4; see also 1B NY PJI3d 2:152, at 140-141 [2012]), and may not be held "liable in negligence for . . . the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result" (Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467; see Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645, 646; see also PJI 2:152). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Robertson v Wells, 95 AD3d 862, 863; Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 837). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:30 pm
(See People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
It is indisputably what it is -- and what it was here -- and the state doesn't get to define (much less legitimate) what a church entails. [read post]
