Search for: "State v. Russell"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am
Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung talks to one of the plaintiffs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
This week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Elonis v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Most states don’t even recognize the independent tort of spoliation of evidence. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
In Baze v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In a recent case called Regnier v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Both states require mutual consent. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
n48 Footnote 48 states: See Mastoras v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 4:01 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
” All Plastic, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am
Briefly: Writing for the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Luis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:41 am
The first opinion of the Term is in Greene v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Cir. 1991); andHester Industries., Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
Burrage v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
[Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to one set of petitioners in the Alabama redistricting cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:26 am
Russell v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:00 am
This past week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit waded into the murky waters with an opinion in Hart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
