Search for: "State v. Sams" Results 341 - 360 of 1,460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 4:18 am by James Romoser
” Writing for OneZero, Ephrat Livni looks at the implications of the court’s decision in the trademark dispute of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm by Francis Pileggi
Class V Stockholders Litigation, case number 2018-0816, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:20 pm by Sam Brunson
A $2,250 tuition voucher (the amount involved in the court’s 2002 decision in Zelman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am by Mansell Law
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court published its decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
On June 5, I recorded a teleforum podcast on my book, Marijuana Federalism: Uncle Sam and Mary Jane, sponsored by the Federalist Society. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Instead, the second interim rule aims to reduce the burden on the contracting community by allowing an offeror to represent annually through the System for Award Management (SAM), via SAM.gov, whether it provides covered telecommunications equipment or services. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
” The late Judge Sam Pointer, appointed to preside over MDL 926, In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, Master File No. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet to win a Webby for the best News & Politics podcast series THE Q&A: “Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary,” Senate Judiciary Committee Oral Arguments in Judiciary Committee v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am by Francis Pileggi
Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock’s April 9 post-trial memorandum opinion found key Nuveen employees tortiously interfered with the Dallas-based PHC’s vital business relationships and opportunities with a half dozen major banks and bond broker-dealers by intentionally mispresenting PHC’s “predatory” investment practices and pushing them to drop PHC to keep Nuveen, self-serving and disingenuous Both parties are Delaware-chartered finance companies that specialize in… [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jasper Tran and Cameron Baker write that Allen v. [read post]