Search for: "State v. York" Results 341 - 360 of 35,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Jones Law Firm, P.C. v J Synergy Green, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 31127(U) April 2, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653730/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” Jack Healy and Kellen Browning of The New York Times report that “Arizona Reinstates 160-Year-Old Abortion Ban; The state’s highest court said the law, moribund for decades under Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Tully (Golieb Fellow, New York University Law) has posted "The Unenumerated Power. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn.… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]