Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 341 - 360
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Scalia explained in what proved to be a prescient dissent in the 1988 case of Morrison v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
” Dissenting from this position was Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Blackmun. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
[Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html]Justice STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court.California is one of at least nine States that authorize the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am
After a few more words, the lawyer ends by urging the court to put a stop to detention practices unworthy of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
The lawsuit swiftly attracted the attention of the Department of Justice. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
Section 5 required a handful of states, including Alaska, to obtain advance approval by the Justice Department before making any change to a state’s electoral process. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
Obama stressed that the United States would not change course in Iraq, stating, “We will be vigilant and we will be relentless. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
In the Department of Justice’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion in this case, it argued thatDr. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
