Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In addition to providing an exhaustive review of the existing system, the report made a number of recommendations that would bring both clarity and relief to songwriters, artists, publishers, record labels, and digital delivery services. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
§§ 1.6(a)(2), 2.195(a)(4), and 2.198 provide that certain correspondence deposited in the Priority Mail Express® service of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Military Justice System; Overbreadth; s. 52R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:39 pm
Artesyn Technologies,Inc., 709 F.3d 1365, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Recently in Automattic Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Developing such international agreements will be challenging, but the alternative is an increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional system for cross-border data requests that benefits no one. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
↑ A & M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Some areas to review are: Overall approach to information technology risk and cybersecurity. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
" In reaching her decision, the judge cited last year's Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp v CLS Bank stating that "while the very idea of allowing multiple-device playback may have been novel at the time of invention, the second step of the Alice/Mayo test requires more than a novel ideal - it requires a specific application of that idea, to ensure that all embodiments of the idea (even if novel) are not preempted. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm
However, in aneffort to respect the presumption against theextraterritorial application of United States law, themajority erroneously declines to consider WesternGecoL.L.C. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
Note in contrast that in Scarlet Extended SA v Societe Belge des Auteurs, Compositeurs SCRL (SABAM) (C-70/10) [2011] ECDR 4 a filtering system that would have required the ISP to itself identify file-sharing websites and then imposing a blocking mechanism did fall fall of Article 15. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
” With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Allen v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
FTC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense v. [read post]
