Search for: "T. C. v. C. E." Results 341 - 360 of 8,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by Jonathan Deschamps
À la lumière de ces principes et de la preuve administrée lors de l’audience, le Tribunal a conclu qu’une grève des chauffeurs d’autobus n’était pas susceptible de causer une augmentation du nombre de véhicules sur la route. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
La juge s’est fondée sur R. c. [read post]
Code 1798.145(h)(3) [4] Commission Implementing Decision for DPF Annex I, Section III.4; 8.b, c, e; 14.e, f and 15.d. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:18 am by Rose Hughes
 Further readingKymab caught the mouse as sufficiency strengthened by UK Supreme Court in Regeneron battle ([2020] UKSC 27) (June 2020)Shining the light on insufficiency (T 1285/15) (August 2020)Illumina v MGI Part 1: Mr Justice Birss on sufficiency, DNA sequencing and chocolate teapots (Feb 2021)US Supreme Court decision in Amgen v Sanofi: The European Perspective (May 2023)Sufficiency of broad functional genus and first medical use claims in Europe… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:55 am by Marcel Pemsel
Even if the shape is sufficiently distinctive because it departs significantly from the norms and customs of the sector concerned, it can still be subject to a rejection on functionality grounds, as the judgment Wajos v EUIPO (Forme d´un contenant) in case T-10/22 shows. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Lapierre c. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:48 pm by Mathieu Canuel
Embauché en 2013 à titre de vice-président senior des opérations, l’employé dépasse ses objectifs année après année et connaît un tel succès qu’il est promu au poste de vice-président principal des opérations globales. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]