Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 341 - 360
of 304,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2014, 12:19 pm
Establece el comienzo del término para juicio rápido. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:11 pm
"Sky won't fall with one less justice": U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
Ce casse-tête a été partiellement résolu par les ordonnances portant réforme du Code du travail qui ont prévu des dispositions spécifiques – et plus claires que les dispositions antérieures – sur les sommes à prendre en compte pour calculer les subventions allouées au comité d’entreprise. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm
J'ai récemment été interpellé par des lecteurs qui regrettaient que je n'évoque pas les projets visant à réformer l'organisation et le fonctionnement des Chambres de recours. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:30 pm
The reality is that “I don’t know” has become the legally accepted synonym for “reasonable use of deadly force. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
Dies gilt auch für die Immunität der Staatsbediensteten. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:10 am
Der angeklagte Sportler räumte die Schüsse auf seine Freundin durch eine geschlossene Tür im Prozess ein. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:58 pm
En effet, durant l’été 2019, l’OPIC avait soumis un remaniement complet des Règles sur les brevet. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 11:03 am
As regards the “examples” referred to in R 42(1)(e), the Board considers that in the circumstances of the present case in which the amended application documents satisfy the requirements of A 83 and A 84 and the description describes in detail at least one way of carrying out the invention within the meaning of R 42(1) (e), specific examples are not indispensable and therefore the fact that none of the specific examples given in the description constitutes an example of… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Thus the requirements for reimbursement under R 103 are not fulfilled. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
R 136(2) adds the requirement of completion of the omitted act. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Such exceptions are set forth, in particular, in R 70(1) (no withdrawal of the request for examination) and in R 84(2) (possible continuation of opposition proceedings after withdrawal of the opposition). [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
The ED argued that the term 1/2 R(0,m) + R(m) was an essential feature of the invention because it was stated in the description of the parent application as originally filed: “The sum of quantities 1/2 R(0,m) and R(m) is the coning compensation and corresponds to the integration of the second and third terms in equation (2). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
N (KÖTÜ N? [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:44 pm
Palmyra, Missouri motorcyclist is seriously injured when another vehicle failed to yield, resulting in a t-bone crash. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This common inventive concept within the meaning of Rule 13.1 PCT and A 82 EPC, respectively, also supports the unity of the application when claim 11 according to the main request is included.If one retraces (wird … nachvollzogen) the argumentation of the ED based on the problem solved such that the known feature “Disturbing the functionality of PMCA results in reducing the motility of sperm cells” is taken into account, one also comes to the conclusion that there is unity of… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it contested the… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it contested the… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:34 am
But apparently, securing dismissals doesn't earn prosecutors' "respect. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In the present case the issuance of the order to refuse interlocutory revision before receipt of the statement of grounds deprived the appellant of the possibility of a fore-shortened appeal procedure provided by A 109 and amounts to a substantial procedural violation, see T 41/97 [5]. [4] However, despite the presence of a substantial procedural violation the board considers that it would not be equitable to reimburse the appeal fee under R 103(1)(a). [read post]
