Search for: "Taylor v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Make whole any unit employees who retired during or after August 2011 and who have been required to contribute towards the cost of health insurance.* In Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313, the court held that health insurance was not a retirement benefit within the meaning of Article 5, Section 7, of the State Constitution.. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
”* In contrast, in Kidwell v Transportation Communications Union, 946 F.2d. 283, the Circuit Court held that a union member employed in an agency shop does not have any right to object to his or her union's using part of a member's dues for activities unrelated to collective negotiations. ** Chapter 338 of the Laws of 2008 made the agency shop fee provisions for public employees setout in the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] permanent for State… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Mandatory-minimum statutes generate some of the worst injustices in federal sentencing: a situation not helped by Judge Beezer's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
Zywicki of George Mason University School of Law, and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:34 am by Jamison Koehler
Yes, a recent case – Taylor v. [read post]