Search for: "Test v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 15,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
But whether there were personal failings is not the operative legal test for whether Willis or Wade should be disqualified from the case, and accordingly that question is not the focus of this essay. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
The president is not an “officer of the United States” as that term is used in the Constitution....2. ... [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA found that marijuana continued to have a high potential for abuse, lacked accepted safety for use under medical supervision and had no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
” A NYT article explains that: People who buy a new watch in the United States will still see Apple’s Blood Oxygen app on the devices, the company said. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unilever United States, Inc., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2023 WL 6429805, No. 20-cv-1672-AGS-BLM (S.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm by Kalvis Golde
State Bank of India 23-390Issue: Whether, to establish a “direct effect in the United States” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, they told the justices, the real problem is that many cities in the western United States simply didn’t want to spend the money to provide housing and services for homeless people. [read post]