Search for: "U.S. v. Session*" Results 341 - 360 of 3,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
  Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 12:23 pm by Brad Schnure
Oroho noted that the New Jersey Legislature took up this exact issue last year after the home of a federal judge in New Jersey was attacked on July 19, 2020, resulting in the murder of the son of U.S. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Jillian Moss
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:52 pm by Florian Mueller
I'd have to re-read the patent document to be 100% sure, but at this point I strongly suspect that this patent lacks a clear boundary and would, therefore, be indefinite by (strict) U.S. standards.The reason for which I believe the patent doesn't map to the 4G/5G specs is that "decreasing and increasing" are mathematically clear directions (numbers go down or up), which depending on the segment of a chart that you look at would give you roughly the shape of a V… [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The U.S. stands virtually alone, among constitutional democracies with well-established judicial review by independent courts, in providing neither for a retirement age nor for a limited term in office for its high court justices. [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
And it’s in the 2017 version of that resource from the even earlier version of that session (available here, with standard caveats that often updates, edits and removals are done for a reason) includes a specific story of law firm audit letters playing a role in a DOJ matter: SEC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:00 am by Howard Friedman
On Tuesday, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Freedom From Religion Foundation v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am by Jennifer Davis
KF35 v. 59 Congressional Record 7455 (May 21, 1920) Draft of Hawaiian Homes Commission Act amended by George McClellan, December 1920, William E. [read post]