Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION" Results 341 - 360 of 913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DNC tends to confirm the suspicion that something else—namely, partisan politics—explains the result. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Lama Mourad, Stephanie Schwartz
Today, many of the cases challenging the Trump administration’s new immigration policies (such as Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
In her new subcabinet post, Brashears will chair the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In this sense, the Court extended the same treatment to mobile applications in the electoral context as Google services facilitating the creation and sharing of websites (Ahmet Yıldırım v Turkey, § 49) and video-hosting services (Cengiz and Others v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
I used the service to confirm quotes by Harry LaForme in his presentation in preparing this post. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Data Protection in the transition period”. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
I’ll say a few words at the end of this post about states and their quarantine powers. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Your application is considered complete when you receive an email confirming that your application was successfully submitted. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Lenczner Slaght website has a post about the recent decision in the case of VMY v SHG 2019 ONSC 7279, “Breach Of Privacy Or Plain Old Defamation? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Your application is considered complete when you receive an email confirming that your application was successfully submitted. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
However, the post office did supply tracking documentation that confirmed delivery of the letter. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Eric Goldman
Trump ruling confirmed that politicians who block constituents on social media are engaging in unconstitutional censorship. [read post]