Search for: "US v. Taft"
Results 341 - 355
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Just because judges are using discretion in interpreting statutes doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily using a delegated discretion. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
It relies on past precedents to justify the use of this novel constitutional authority. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Julie Suk and Caroline Fredrickson are newer friends, with whom I worked (as with Mark, Steve, and Jennifer) on what I call the “Tomasky project,” a group that came together charged by Michael Tomasky, the editor of Democracy (and now, as well, The New Republic) to design a constitution that would serve us well in the 21stcentury. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
” Looking to the history of the NLRA’s enactment, the court noted that the limitations period in Sec. 10(b) was the focus of significant attention when it was introduced as part of the Taft-Hartley Amendments in 1947. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
The Board adopted the hearing officer's recommendation to overrule the challenge to the ballot of Ricki Tucker, using a different rationale. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
For the Symposium on the Constitution and Economic InequalityCynthia EstlundJoseph Fishkin and William Forbath, in their book-in-progress, have brilliantly exposed and mined a once-powerful, mostly-forgotten vein of constitutional political economic thought: the notion that widely shared economic opportunity, and a broad middle class flanked by neither an underclass nor an oligarchic overclass, are essential foundations of our republican form of government. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
Indeed, in the 1936 case of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm
The decision is very fact specific, but because of the range of issues involved, the opinion is interesting and it also underscores the critical importance of the precise wording used in exclusionary clauses. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
It was used by the Americans to torture Filipinos after the Spanish American War; it was used by the Nazi Gestapo; Japanese officers committed it upon Americans and were executed for their acts after World War II; it was used by the French in Algiers, by Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge, and by Latin American dictatorships such as Chile and Argentina. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The state’s corporate franchise tax (CFT), a business privilege tax first imposed in 1902, was levied on the greater of net income or net worth.[5] The tangible personal property (TPP) tax, termed “the tax every businessman loves to hate” by then-Governor Bob Taft,[6] was levied on machinery, inventory, furniture, fixtures, and other business equipment.[7] In such an environment, even an arbitrary mode of taxation could be an attractive alternative. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
In 1910, William Howard Taft, a Republican, nominated two Democrats to the court. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
