Search for: "United Energy Corp. v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 1:15 pm
DTWC Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm
The Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo Logan) applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to discharge dredged or fill material from a mountain-top coal mine in West Virginia into three streams and their tributaries. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:00 am
The case settles a circuit split but leaves unresolved some fundamental questions about how the United States ought to decide whether amounts paid by Americans to foreign governments qualify as a tax on income, war profits, or excess profits. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm
”Invitrogen Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:49 pm
United States, 265F.3d 1371, 1377–79 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:35 am
United States (health care services, federal breach of contract)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:Stephens v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
After the strategy to force up the stock price failed, Edelman brought a series of unsuccessful lawsuits in France and the United States against the Taittingers seeking to wrest control of the company. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
However, hydropower proponents argue that hydropower is cleaner than some conventional energy sources, and point to recent findings that additional hydropower capacity could help the United States reach proposed energy, economic, and environmental goals. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
From the decision, Semiconductor Energy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:28 pm
River Spirit Casino (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, jurisdiction)United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
Fuel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:42 am
In Magsil Corp., et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:12 am
The Antitrust Division alleges that Exelon violated the district court’s Hold Separate and Final Judgment entered in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
