Search for: "United States v. Best et al" Results 341 - 360 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    ************************************   For many D&O insurers, the risk of exposure posed by cybersecurity incidents involving their insureds has been unclear at best. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    ************************************   For many D&O insurers, the risk of exposure posed by cybersecurity incidents involving their insureds has been unclear at best. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Commission’s discussion of filtering technology is at best magical thinking, and at worst cynically disingenuous. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
The Commission’s discussion of filtering technology is at best magical thinking, and at worst cynically disingenuous. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Daphne Keller
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
 This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
LEXIS 155132 :Plaintiffs [ MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL et al] assert infringement of the following claims against Snap-on: claims 1 and 8-10 of U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  In Turner, the United States Supreme Court rejected a Brady claim because both prongs of this test were not satisfied. [read post]